Sign In
Home
About
Main Menu
Overview
Leadership Board
Program Partners
Affiliates
News Center
Contact
Advocacy
Main Menu
Featured
Insights & POV
Roundtables
Reports
Knowledge Center
Featured
Events
Industry News
Transform Tech TV
Sign In
Edit Fact
Text
I'd like to open a personal account http://download-directx-free.ru/xiaomi-mijia-driving-recorder-1s-avtomobilnyi-videoregistrator-za-50/ buy ribavirin I think the headline writer got it backward. A merged airline COULD offer more, WOULD charge more. Ever since the demise of the CAB in 1979-80 timeframe, airlines have been consolidating and giving much less for a higher cost to passengers. This natural penchant of big business to extract as much from customers as possible while giving them less and les is a natural phenomenon. Don’t forget that the e-mail and internal airline evidence DOJ is using in its suit to block the AA/US merger indicated that its chief aim is to position itself to charge more and higher fares and fees. Almost nothing but a seat is included in the ticket cost anymore. Why would it be unrealistic to expect a traveler to need luggage, sometimes that must be checked? Sure, a meal is nice, though unnecessary, but to gouge clients for traveling with supplies for their travels? Shameless.
Publication
Url
Actions
Delete
List Facts