Sign In
Home
About
Main Menu
Overview
Leadership Board
Program Partners
Affiliates
News Center
Contact
Advocacy
Main Menu
Featured
Insights & POV
Roundtables
Reports
Knowledge Center
Featured
Events
Industry News
Transform Tech TV
Sign In
Edit Fact
Text
What's the last date I can post this to to arrive in time for Christmas? http://fittor.fun/sitemaps/5.html be3x Hasan acted as his own attorney but called no witnesses in his defense said little during the trial. He wanted to argue that he carried out the shooting in "defense of others" â namely, Taliban insurgents fighting American soldiers in Afghanistan â but the judge denied that strategy before the trial started. Hasan told jurors during a brief opening statement that the evidence would "clearly show" he was the gunman, but that it wouldn't tell the whole story. He cross-examined only three of prosecutors' nearly 90 witnesses, including mumbling through a series of questions while asking his former supervisor about "medical personnel initiating mercy killings." He made few objections but did challenge the government's definition of "jihad," successfully asking the judge that jurors be told that, "under Islam, the central doctrine that calls on believers to combat enemies of the religious belief."
Publication
Url
Actions
Delete
List Facts